Reviewing the Rules of a Sporting
Assciation
Sports Lawyer was asked to review the rules
of a Melbourne Metropolitan Football League. Paul Horvath initially
reviewed the Tribunal Rules to ensure that they were cleared and
that there was no uncertainty about meaning. It was found that with
cases that had arisen over a number of years, and defences used in
the Tribunal, some Rules needed clarification. Also, some practises
that occured in Tribunal hearings were unwritten rules that
everyone understood, but they were not in the written Rules.
It was only a matter of time before a party
challenged the Rules because as they were written they did not
specifically ban certain conduct, even though all Tribunal
participants knew of the unwritten rule. The change was needed.
About twelve months later, the same client asked Sports
Lawyer to overhaul the entire constitution to remove
outdated clauses and to put it into a logical order. It is not
uncommon that 20-30 years can pass without constitutions or rules
being updated.
This may leave a League exposed to some legal risk
or liability as the rules may be inaccurate and outdated and may
not suit the current board's needs. The Rules may have been created
in a different era when the financial resources available to the
League were much more limited. The Rules are now much easier to
read and make much more sense.
|